Chemours faces a hefty fine if it discharges the chemical again Economy

22 dec 2023 om 16:40 Update: 4 uur geleden

The fine that Chemours will receive if it continues to release the chemical as of January 1 is justified. The judge ruled that on Friday. The threatened fine for emitting another substance will be cancelled.

Chemours appealed to the court against the two fines imposed by the province of Zuid Holland (so-called fine order).

The first penalty is the discharge of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) into the sewer. If the factory in Dordrecht continues to discharge TFA from January 1, it must pay €125,000 for each violation, up to a maximum of €1.25 million.

Chemours initially said it did not know that TFA was created during the production process. It also says it cannot guarantee that matter will not be created. However, it has now applied for a permit to unload.

TFA is a type of pfas and is classified by the RIVM among substances of possible very high concern. The exact health consequences of pfas (the collective name for chemicals that do not break down) are not yet known. PFAs are linked to various cancers and decreased fertility.

During Tuesday's hearing, Chemours indicated that if it was no longer permitted to discharge TFA, the plant would have to be closed. The governorate doubted this. “But if that's the result, that's the result,” the district attorney said.

1:33

Europe wants a ban on PFAS: what again?

Chemicals are still allowed to emit greenhouse gases

The judge agreed with Chemours in a second case. This case concerns the release of HCFC-22 gas. This gas does not pose direct harm to the environment, but it is one of the greenhouse gases that deplete the ozone layer.

Chemours is authorized to release 3,500 kilograms of HCFC-22 per year. During maintenance of one of the storage containers containing the substance, a large amount of HCFC-22 was released such that the permissible annual amount was exceeded.

The province believed that the gas released during maintenance was part of the “annual licensed tonnage,” and Chemours did not. The judge agrees with the manufacturer.

Both provisions relate to an interim measure, so it is possible that a judge may decide differently at a later date.

Braeden Haige

“Total coffee specialist. Hardcore reader. Incurable music scholar. Web guru. Freelance troublemaker. Problem solver. Travel trailblazer.”

Chemours faces a hefty fine if it discharges the chemical again Economy

Europe wants a ban on PFAS: what again?

GALA lacks a chapter on e-health

Weird beer can taste really good.

Planets contain much more water than previously thought

Actor Alain Delon’s dog was not given an injection to be buried together: what are our rules?

Bitcoin price rises after new jobs data from US

Subscribe! Cristiano Ronaldo is now also breaking a world record with… a brand new YouTube channel

GALA lacks a chapter on e-health

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

More Stories

GALA lacks a chapter on e-health

Weird beer can taste really good.

Planets contain much more water than previously thought

You may have missed

Actor Alain Delon’s dog was not given an injection to be buried together: what are our rules?

Bitcoin price rises after new jobs data from US

Subscribe! Cristiano Ronaldo is now also breaking a world record with… a brand new YouTube channel

GALA lacks a chapter on e-health